Victim Statement and Case Summary — Incident of 8 August 2018 (Ottawa, Canada)
Hilton Lac-Leamy Casino (Ottawa)
I. Core Understanding of the Case
The incident that occurred on August 8, 2018, at Hilton Lac-Leamy Casino in Ottawa, Canada, constitutes the originating event of all subsequent experiences I have endured.
In my personal understanding, without this incident, everything that followed—including abnormal law-enforcement actions, long-term stigmatization, and systemic harm inflicted upon me and my children—would not have occurred.
This was not an isolated conflict, but rather a deliberately constructed and continuously amplified starting point of a case.
⸻
II. Why Hilton Lac-Leamy Casino Must Be Explicitly Identified
I must explicitly identify Hilton Lac-Leamy Casino, not because it is a casino per se, but because:
• It operates under the Hilton International Hotel Group;
• This system possesses highly standardized security, surveillance, record-keeping, and inter-institutional coordination capabilities;
• The venue is not an ordinary public space, but rather a highly controllable, deployable, and multi-resource-connected node location.
It was within such a controlled environment that I became involved in an event not aimed at factual adjudication, but at image construction and public display.
⸻
III. Persistent Correlated Phenomena Following the Incident (Factual Level)
Following this incident, my life has been marked by a series of highly repetitive, interrelated phenomena that cannot be reasonably explained as coincidence, including but not limited to:
• Repeated abnormal treatment and personal humiliation within the Hilton hotel system and related settings;
• Recurrent intersections of narratives involving the entertainment industry, technology platforms, religious symbols, and political discourse;
• Long-term negative labeling and narrative construction targeting my personal image;
• Psychological suggestion, naming implication, media insinuation, and sustained psychological pressure directed at my minor children;
• Recurrent exposure related to cryptocurrency, digital wallets, and online narrative dissemination;
• Multiple instances of abnormal law-enforcement conduct in Toronto and other locations, including:
• A total of 21 recorded 911 emergency calls;
• Attendance by multiple police chiefs, division heads, and senior officials, without any effective judicial resolution;
• Incidents involving violence against third parties, followed by photographing and showing such images to me;
• Law-enforcement or scene arrangements involving live broadcasting, filming, or demonstrative display.
These facts are not subjective speculation, but realities I have repeatedly and continuously experienced over an extended period of time.
⸻
IV. My Perceived “Role” Within This System
Over time, I gradually realized that I was not treated as an ordinary citizen.
Within public narratives, I was repeatedly portrayed as:
• A drug user
• A gambler
• A morally disordered individual
• A negative exemplar of social order
These labels were continuously reinforced, displayed, and disseminated, without being established through any lawful judicial process.
In my understanding, I was treated more as an “exemplary subject” used to carry social problems, political tensions, and religious narratives, rather than as a citizen entitled to protection and due process.
⸻
V. Irreversible Harm Inflicted Upon My Children
I must solemnly state:
The harm inflicted upon my children constitutes the most severe and least defensible aspect of this case.
My children:
• Have lived since birth in an environment shaped by rumors and stigma regarding their mother;
• Have endured discrimination and psychological pressure from society, media, and their surroundings during their development;
• Were forced to grow up amid negative narratives about their mother, political insinuations, and religious discourse;
• Have long remained in an unstable condition regarding physical safety, psychological security, and personal dignity.
They were not participants in this case, yet were compelled to bear its consequences.
No society governed by the rule of law should permit minors to be sacrificed in this manner.
⸻
VI. My Distinct Position Regarding the State, the People, Law Enforcement, and Religion
I must clearly state that:
• I do not hate Canada as a country;
• I do not hate the Canadian people;
• I believe that the majority of the public is unaware of the truth of these events.
However, I cannot accept:
• Judicially uninformed, indifferent, and performative law-enforcement conduct;
• Long-term intervention into individuals and families without clear judicial boundaries;
• Intrusion, recording, and exploitation of private life under the guise of religious research or cultural dissemination;
• The treatment of a family—especially minors—as narrative material, research subjects, or propaganda tools.
In my lived experience, religion did not protect me or my children, but instead became the outer covering through which harm was inflicted.
⸻
VII. Concluding Statement of the Case
In my view, this is not an ordinary criminal case, nor a mere individual dispute.
It represents:
• Law enforcement used as an outer shell;
• Religious and cultural narratives used as packaging;
• Political and social issues as background;
• A woman and her children used as the bearing objects;
Through which long-term, systemic persecution and demonstrative harm were carried out.
I present these facts not out of hatred, but because:
Regardless of how the world changes, cruelty toward innocent children must never be permitted.
⸻
3️⃣ Testimony and Personal Defence
In this case, I was a long-term super VIP client of Hilton Casino du Lac-Leamy in Ottawa, where I legally gambled and genuinely lost nearly CAD 5 million in cash. Based on years of legitimate transactions, I formed reasonable and sufficient trust in the casino’s and its partner bank’s compliance review, fund verification, and anti-money-laundering procedures.
Casino Information:
Hilton Casino du Lac-Leamy
3, Boulevard du Casino, Gatineau–Ottawa, Quebec, J8Y 6X4, Canada
⸻
I. Compliance Conduct on August 8, 2018
On August 8, 2018, I strictly followed standard casino and bank procedures by submitting a bank draft bearing my true legal name.
The draft was non-cash and non-anonymous, and was verified by both the bank and the casino before and after submission.
After receiving the faxed copy of the draft, neither the casino nor the bank raised any risk alerts or objections. Instead, they proactively invited me to the casino and assisted in arranging flights and gaming chips.
The entire process was open, transparent, and verifiable, with all details preserved in casino surveillance footage and bank records.
⸻
II. Subjective State and Boundary of Responsibility
At the time, I was entirely unaware of any abnormality in the funds, and I did not attempt to evade review, manipulate procedures, or conceal facts.
Based on the form of the funds, the named draft, and dual verification, a reasonable third party would have had no grounds to suspect illegality.
My role was limited to:
• The named individual submitting the draft pursuant to procedure;
• Not the source of funds;
• Not the controller of funds;
• Having no authority to verify, approve, or release funds.
If the funds were later determined to be problematic, responsibility should lawfully trace back to the source of funds and the institutional verification process, not to an individual acting lawfully in reasonable reliance on the system.
⸻
III. Objective Anomalies in Names, Culture, and Address (For Record Only)
During the case, multiple non-negligible objective anomalies emerged, recorded here solely for judicial review:
• Concentration of names and cultural symbols, including:
• Oscar (Hollywood cultural symbol);
• Kabir / Sam (significant names in Indian and Islamic contexts);
• Jay / Blue Jay (clearly codified naming);
• Cross-appearance of Islamic, South Asian, and Middle Eastern religious and regional backgrounds;
• Coincidental consistency between the casino’s street number and my residential address number.
Individually these may appear coincidental; collectively and repeatedly affecting the same victim, they constitute reasonable grounds for investigation.
⸻
IV. Subsequent Abnormal Experiences Involving Hilton Hotels and Police (Timeline Supplement)
On August 24, 2024, I was subjected to violent law-enforcement action in the Blue Mountain area of Ontario, sustaining multiple bruises.
Between 3:00–4:00 a.m., I was abandoned by police at the entrance of a local Hilton hotel.
Subsequently, the hotel demanded CAD 800 for a short stay of several hours, after which I was expelled in a manner carrying clear humiliation.
In subsequent years, I experienced similar abnormal treatment at multiple Hilton hotels and other hotels in Toronto.
These facts are provided solely as timeline supplementation, without requesting legal qualification at this stage, but requesting judicial recording and assessment of relevance.
⸻
V. Long-Term Dominant Role — Chen
Legal fees in this case were not paid by me, but were **arranged and paid by Chen. I did not participate in any negotiation or payment of legal fees, was not present at the time of payment, and never received or saw any receipts or proof of payment.
Since 2015, during my continued interactions with Chen, all key actions related to this case were long-term directed by him, constituting a systematic, multi-year process, not isolated incidents.
The bank drafts, so-called “profit opportunities,” introduction of individuals, and routing of the victim into casinos and underground casinos were all proposed, promoted, and organized by Chen. I remained in a position of being guided and exploited.
Between 2015 and subsequent years, Chen repeatedly brought me to gamble at Ottawa casinos, resulting in repeated losses, and later guided me into Toronto underground casinos, causing further sustained economic loss and credit damage.
Chen graduated from the University of Ottawa. (His parents served as Chinese diplomatic representatives in Canada; he holds dual nationality and is currently engaged in mineral-resource business activities in South Africa.)
Under his direction, events and relationships were highly concentrated around Ottawa, extending to the Canadian federal seat, Quebec judicial system, Ontario judicial bodies, Toronto organized crime groups, Toronto Police Service, and certain local enterprises, repeatedly intersecting over many years.
This section is a factual timeline and relational structure statement only, intended to demonstrate long-term dominance and continuous harm, without requesting legal characterization at this stage.
⸻
Rights Statement and Judicial Requests
This statement constitutes my lawful exercise of the right to self-defence and factual narration as a victim.
I respectfully request that judicial authorities:
1. Confirm my status as a good-faith third party, acting in reasonable reliance on licensed casino and bank compliance, without subjective intent or negligence;
2. Formally obtain and review bank and casino verification, approval, and surveillance records, which have been confirmed to exist by counsel, to determine true responsibility;
3. Redirect investigative focus toward the source of funds and systemic verification responsibility, rather than an individual who acted lawfully.
⸻
Supplementary Testimony — 2023 Tim Hortons Incident
In the summer of 2023, I was involved in a police incident at a Tim Hortons café near my residence, following a conflict with a female individual.
The incident began when I observed the woman using her phone to aim at or record my face. A verbal dispute ensued. In anger, I poured a cup of iced coffee onto her clothing.
She immediately called 911 and physically grabbed my clothing to prevent me from leaving. Because she first restrained me, a further confrontation occurred.
Upon arrival, police immediately issued a criminal charge notice, charging me with “assault with a weapon”, treating the act of pouring iced coffee as a weapon. I was informed that I must appear in court.
To my understanding, in Canada this charge is considered extremely serious, socially and legally comparable to an allegation of violent attack with a firearm.
Later, when I attended fingerprinting, I perceived that surrounding officers appeared to already know my situation (this is my personal perception). The atmosphere and certain conduct made me feel mocked and demeaned.
⸻
Supplementary Testimony — Early Morning 2025 Incident & Vehicle Safety Concerns
At approximately 3:00 a.m. on June 9, 2025, I was awakened by abnormal noise from adjacent walls and plumbing. I opened YouTube and saw a video related to my brother titled “going to died” (original title reproduced as-is), which caused severe psychological distress.
My brother was involved in a Mercedes-Benz vehicle accident several years earlier. After the accident, he developed serious psychological illness and has been unable to participate normally in work or daily life.
Between 2022 and 2024, based on materials and evidence in my possession, I observed that multiple Mercedes-Benz vehicles driven by myself, my mother, and Kabir exhibited highly similar abnormalities, including:
• Severe brake malfunction and grinding noises;
• Apparent speed limitation;
• Dashboard display failure;
• Abnormal system control behavior.
These were not isolated or accidental failures, but repeated across different vehicles and users, forming a systemic pattern (this assessment is based on my experience and evidence).
All events occurred in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and exhibit continuity with subsequent family, social, and public affairs.
I personally submitted all materials and evidence to the City of Toronto, which acknowledged receipt but provided no response.
I also repeatedly contacted 911, without receiving substantive follow-up.
Additional Safety Statement
While these vehicles remained in such conditions, I, my family, my two adult children, my brother’s family, and their children continued to transport infants and minors.
All individuals were thus subjected to ongoing and serious potential risks to life and bodily safety.
⸻
Declaration of Truthfulness
I hereby solemnly declare that all statements provided are based on my genuine experiences and objectively occurring facts, supported by materials and evidence in my possession.
This testimony is made truthfully and in good faith within the framework of law and fact.
