OJWA — 8 August 2018 International Case
Original Authorship, Intellectual Property, and Legal Liability Statement”** *(Official Version · For Public Release and Judicial Submission)*
⸻
I. Original Authorship and Intellectual Property Ownership
All texts, testimonies, narratives, analyses, structured content, legal assessments, research outputs, and any derivative works arising from the 8 August 2018 Case are jointly and lawfully owned by Victim O and the Omnipotent Justice World Alliance (OJWA), including original authorship rights, intellectual property rights, and moral (personality) rights.
No individual, institution, media entity, corporation, governmental body, religious organization, or platform may, without the prior written authorization of both Victim O and OJWA, reproduce, excerpt, modify, translate, adapt, reinterpret, disseminate, publish, distribute, or otherwise use any part of this case for commercial, political, religious, promotional, or any other purposes.
⸻
II. Prohibition of Imitation, Fabrication, Adaptation, or Misleading Narratives
This case constitutes an international-level judicial matter spanning multiple jurisdictions and involving complex elements of religion, politics, technology, social manipulation, and international criminal models.
Prior to formal adjudication, legal definition, and determination by international judicial institutions, any unauthorized act, including but not limited to: • Imitating the case • Adapting the case • Film, animation, or dramatized portrayals • Documentary or narrative productions • Fictional reinterpretations • Deliberate distortion of facts • Speculative public commentary
shall be deemed as malicious interference with judicial processes, misleading public opinion, infringement of victims’ rights, and actionable legal violations.
⸻
III. Judicial Nature of the Case and Prohibition of Audiovisualization
The 8 August 2018 Case is a critical judicial event within the field of global criminal law reform and is currently in the following stages: 1. International legal research and judicial discourse 2. Facts not yet formally established 3. Charges not yet legally defined 4. Not yet entered into formal judicial proceedings 5. International criminal law reform and modeling stage
Until the conclusion of the above stages, any form of audiovisual production or public narrative dissemination shall be regarded as: • Deviating from potential final judicial outcomes • Undermining the independent discretion of international judicial bodies • Distorting factual foundations • Interfering with international criminal modeling research • Obstructing international legal reform efforts • Challenging the foundational integrity of the international criminal justice system
Accordingly, any unauthorized filming, creation, or dissemination may constitute: • Obstruction of justice • Interference with investigations • Manipulation of public opinion • Secondary harm to the victim • Violations of Article 70 of the Rome Statute (Offences Against the Administration of Justice) • Breaches of international intellectual property and moral rights conventions
⸻
IV. Legal Liability
Any unauthorized use of the materials of this case shall give rise to civil and criminal liability under, including but not limited to: • The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works • The WIPO Copyright Treaty • International Human Rights Law • The United Nations Convention Against Torture • The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Article 70 – Offences Against the Administration of Justice) • Applicable national laws concerning copyright, reputation, privacy, and criminal liability
Liability may include, but is not limited to: financial damages, injunctive relief, cross-border judicial cooperation, international arbitration, and civil and criminal prosecution.
⸻
V. Prohibition of Misleading Public Opinion and Social Narratives
Prior to formal trial, conviction, and completion of international legal definition:
Any unverified public opinion shaping, storytelling, interpretation, media commentary, or social-platform discussion—where biased, misleading, or commercially motivated—may constitute: • Infringement of victims’ rights • Distortion of case facts • Interference with judicial independence • Disruption of international criminal law reform processes
All public discussion related to this case must be based exclusively on official materials released by OJWA and relevant international judicial institutions.
⸻
VI. Authorization Framework
Any individual or entity seeking to use, cite, research, film, teach, or adapt materials related to this case must obtain a formal written authorization jointly signed by Victim O and OJWA.
Any use without such authorization shall be deemed unlawful, and the responsible party shall bear full legal consequences.
⸻
Omnipotent Justice World Alliance (OJWA) International Justice Research & Accountability Platform