The COVID-19 pandemic inflicted massive loss of life and global instability, with consequences far beyond a conventional public health crisis. If future international investigations reveal elements of human orchestration or intentional concealment, all responsible individuals and organizations must bear the highest level of criminal liability under international law.
Notably, global media framing and algorithmic distribution in the early stages of the pandemic significantly shaped public perception. Some outlets repeatedly emphasized a “specific animal origin,” focusing discussions on pangolins and similar narratives, which weakened or obscured more critical accountability leads. As time passed, the topic of origin rapidly vanished from international discourse, raising widespread concerns about whether the truth was intentionally diluted.
From a chronological perspective, the outbreak of COVID-19 coincided almost perfectly with a global economic restructuring:
1.Rapid expansion of the digital economy: Internet platforms, delivery industries, remote work, and mobile payments became essential services, achieving near-monopolistic dominance within months.
2.Explosive growth of new energy industries: Electric vehicles, energy storage, AI chips, and autonomous driving received massive capital, reshaping markets within two years.
3.Deep integration of healthcare and technology: Telemedicine, mRNA platforms, algorithmic diagnostics, and health big data became strategic pillars.
4.Geoeconomic realignment: Oil and shipping were disrupted while new-energy supply chains surged.
Taken together, these developments reveal a distinct structural pattern:
• A sudden pandemic outbreak
• Forced global migration into digitalized life
• Tech giants and new-energy leaders emerge as primary beneficiaries
• Media narratives downplay essential evidence
• Global economic power concentrates into “Internet + MedTech + New Energy”
While this does not prove intentional orchestration, the timing and highly concentrated flows of benefit raise legitimate global concerns:
Were critical leads ignored?
Should international judicial bodies conduct independent investigations?
Thus, the pandemic exposed structural risks in the digital era: the ability to manipulate information and dilute truth.
The harm caused by COVID-19 is immeasurable, and the simultaneous expansion of technology capital before and after the pandemic raises profound judicial concerns:
How did digital, new-energy, and online economies mature with such unprecedented speed? Was there pre-positioning?
If future investigations confirm abnormal pre-pandemic structuring, such conduct must fall under international judicial reform, becoming a priority issue at the 24th Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute.
II. A Precise Timeline of the Pandemic and Global Technological Transformation
The following timeline illustrates the high synchronicity between the pandemic and global technological shifts:
2017–2018: AI, automation, and mRNA technologies enter strategic deployment.
…
2025: The international community begins systematically reassessing anomalous structures surrounding the pandemic.
III. Structural Logic of Events
our full content is retained; below is its English rendering:
…
Thus, a new judicial framework must be established within the Rome Statute system.
────────────────────────
IV. Reinforced Key Conclusions
…
This is not merely legal reform; it is essential to safeguarding humanity’s future.
────────────────────────
V. OJWA Case W: A Prototype of New-Generation Crimes Against Humanity
The international case W, initiated by OJWA, is not a conventional cyber-infringement matter. It exposes for the first time a new class of criminal architecture combining religious suggestion mechanisms, algorithmic manipulation, cross-border data theft, psychological conditioning, and capital-market interference. Through manipulating belief, inducing dependency, and influencing emotional and behavioral patterns, affected populations fall into cognitive disorientation and cultural erosion. This constitutes a prototype of systematic crimes against humanity — a new form of warfare rooted in cultural invasion, technological domination, and psychological enslavement.
Therefore, Case W must be redefined as a new category of crimes against humanity. OJWA recommends:
First, establish an International Religious Law to regulate cross-border spiritual manipulation and pseudo-religious entities;
Second, establish an International Internet Court dedicated to technological and algorithm-driven systemic harm.
++ ++Furthermore, OJWA urges the introduction of sanction-based funding mechanisms to strengthen ICC, ICJ, and INTERPOL, ensuring independent, long-term, and forceful enforcement capabilities.++